<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Security Beacon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com</link>
	<description>Because Your Life Should Be Secure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 02:57:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DNSChanger and Your Internet Connection</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1472&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dnschanger-and-your-internet-connection</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1472#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virus / Malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some months ago the FBI shutdown a criminal ring that operated a network of rogue DNS servers. These servers intercepted communications from computers infected with malware known as DNSChanger. The malware exploited a weakness of the Microsoft Windows operating systems but can also affect the DNS settings in various home and small office routers. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some months ago the FBI shutdown a criminal ring that operated a network of rogue DNS servers. These servers intercepted communications from computers infected with malware known as DNSChanger. The malware exploited a weakness of the Microsoft Windows operating systems but can also affect the DNS settings in various home and small office routers. The FBI estimated that some 570,000 users around the world were affected by the malware. Rather than shutdown the rogue servers and a leave over a half-million people without Internet access the FBI opted to set up a stand-in server to give people time to discover the infection and fix their DNS settings. Unfortunately, the stand-in servers are set to be shutdown July 9, 2012 so it is important that you check your computer and router soon or come July 10 you might not Internet service! If you want more details on this I urge you to go read the synopsis and recommendations on this FBI website:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/november/malware_110911" target="_blank">http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/november/malware_110911</a></p>
<p>If you are concerned about cyber security you may also want to review our <a title="Security Check List" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?page_id=190" target="_blank">Security Check List</a> for more tips on protecting your data and privacy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1472</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>External Hard Drives as Backup Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1464&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=external-hard-drives-as-backup-solutions</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1464#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 22:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eSATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USB Hard Drive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Background</p> <p>In the old days, the primary media for computer backup was magnetic tape. I still remember using cassette tapes to back up programs and data from a TRS-80 computer in the early 1980&#8242;s. It was so slow and unreliable that it drove me to spend the $500 on a single sided 5.25&#8243; floppy disk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p>In the old days, the primary media for computer backup was magnetic tape. I still remember using cassette tapes to back up programs and data from a TRS-80 computer in the early 1980&#8242;s. It was so slow and unreliable that it drove me to spend the $500 on a single sided 5.25&#8243; floppy disk drive that could hold all of 100 kB of data. The reel-to-reel tapes used in university mainframes and the cartridge tapes of later PCs were of course much more reliable and had vastly larger storage capacity than the cassette tapes and were the gold standard for preserving data for many years. Tape is still important for many organizations but today&#8217;s hard drives are so large and inexpensive that they have become the preferred solution for most individuals and small businesses.</p>
<p><strong>External Drive Options</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used external USB 2.0 and FireWire drives over the last half-decade or so with generally good results. Theoretical throughput for USB 2.0 is 480 Mbs (Mega bits per second) while FireWire offers a 400 Mbs and an 800 Mbs option. This sounds fast but you&#8217;ll never realize full throughput with most devices. Considering that many of our hard drives are now in excess of 1 TeraByte even the theoretical speeds of these interfaces are such that backing up a loaded desktop machine might well take many hours or even a day or more to complete. The latest USB 3.0 interface claims up to 5 Gbs (giga bits per second) transfer rate so newer external drives based on this interface should offer a nice speed-up provided your computer machine is equipped with USB 3.0 ports. I expect USB 3.0 will likely become the dominant interface within the next 5 years or so. Until then there is also another interface that might an even better option for external backup drives.</p>
<p><strong>eSATA Advantage</strong></p>
<p>eSATA (external SATA) supports transfer rates of 3 Gps or 6 Gps depending on your PC and the hard drive in use. eSATA is basically the same interface as your internal hard drive so it is very fast. Most new PCs and motherboards come with eSATA ports. If you&#8217;ve got an older desktop machine you can likely add eSATA capability by buying an inexpensive rear panel adapter such as this one:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/securbeaco-20/detail/B006K25ING" target="_blank">StarTech.com 2 Port SAT to eSATA Adapter Plate</a></p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve got the adapter installed you only need an eSATA cable and a hard drive in an enclosure with eSATA capability.  While eSATA enclosures aren&#8217;t quite as common as the USB variety they are out there if you look. I have an older Western Digital MyBook 1.5 Terabyte drive that offers USB 2.0, Firewire and eSATA ports. My experience has been that the drive works better with the eSATA adapter than it does with either of the other interfaces.</p>
<p>I have a lot of backup hard drives so I have come to prefer bare drives over the added expense and fuss of having each drive in it&#8217;s own enclosure and having to keep track of the various dedicated wall warts and cables. This is where eSATA is really nice since you can buy a docking station such as this one:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/securbeaco-20/detail/B006K25ING" target="_blank">StarTech.com eSATA Docking Station for Dual 2.5 or 3.5 inch HDD</a></p>
<p>and plug your bare drives into the docking station as you need them. The docking station linked above even offers USB 2.0 capability so that you can use the docking station with a legacy laptop that might not have eSATA capability. (It&#8217;s not nearly as fast when running on USB though!)</p>
<p>To mitigate the risk of dropping or inflicting static discharge damage on the bare drives I use Silicon Forensics drive transporter cases like these:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://astore.amazon.com/securbeaco-20/detail/B005JR19KY" target="_blank">Silicon Forensics Drive Transporter Cases</a></p>
<p>to protect the bare drives when they aren&#8217;t in the docking stations. These cases also work great for protecting the drives if you need to ship them to an off-site remote backup storage site.</p>
<p>In addition to speed, convenience and cost, eSATA also offers some other advantages. It has been my experience that backing up drives on USB or Firewire interfaces can sometimes lead to a sluggish or in some cases even a hung (i.e. unresponsive or crashed) computer. I&#8217;ve noticed that certain USB peripherals and related software misbehave when the USB bus is subjected to throughput during backups. I&#8217;ve also seen backups and computers hang as a result of connecting and / or disconnecting USB peripherals from the USB bus when a backup was in progress. By moving your backup drives to eSATA you eliminate the potential for those kind of nasty interactions and free up the USB ports for other devices.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>Over the last few months I&#8217;ve configured my backup system to use bare SATA drives and eSATA docking stations. I&#8217;ve found that the backups are much faster and the system runs much smoother than it did when using older USB 2.0 and Firewire 400 based external drives. By using the Silicon Forensics Drive Transporter cases I can keep the bare drives protected when they aren&#8217;t in use and easily ship them to off-site storage locations.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve spent any time on this site you know backups are important. If you don&#8217;t already have a backup solution you may wish to consider a setup like the one described above. Be sure to check out our Amazon store front for other hard drives, adapters and docking stations.</p>
<p>JR</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1464</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) = BAD IDEA!</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1458&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=byod-bring-your-own-device-bad-idea</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1458#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3G / 4G networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell / Smart Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi / Wireless networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction</p> <p>BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) is a new trend (maybe the norm in some places by now?) where employees bring their personal computers, phones, USB flash drives, etc. to work and use them for work as well as personal needs. Companies are apparently encouraging BYOD based on the theory that it keeps employees happy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) is a new trend (maybe the norm in some places by now?) where employees bring their personal computers, phones, USB flash drives, etc. to work and use them for work as well as personal needs. Companies are apparently encouraging BYOD based on the theory that it keeps employees happy because they get to use a device of their choice (e.g. iPhone, iPad, Blackberry, Android Tablet, etc.) and the company saves money and gets a more productive employee in the process. On the surface it sounds like a good idea and companies and individuals are embracing the concept in mass these days. There are however some downsides to BYOD for both company and employees that in my mind make BYOD a bad idea!</p>
<p><strong>Downside for the Company<br />
</strong></p>
<p>I can imagine that for some companies the cost savings alone will drive them to a BYOD policy. Depending on the industry and type of work being done on the devices, a BYOD approach may be a big cost saver provided the company can also live with the potential downsides. What are some of those downsides? I&#8217;m not sure I can list them all, but here are a few to get you started:</p>
<ol>
<li>What if a BYOD with company data is lost or stolen? Is the employee or company responsible for the loss?</li>
<li>What if a BYOD is corrupted with a virus, trojan, worm or other form of malware that results in a data breach? How do you explain that to the Board of Directors, shareholders, customers, or, in the case of HIPPA or Sarbanes-Oxley, the government auditors?</li>
<li>What if a BYOD results in the infection of the corporate network with virus or malware? Who is fired? The employee? The overwhelmed IT guy? Or the hot-shot manager who last year got the big promotion because of all the money he supposedly saved the company by implementing a BYOD policy?</li>
<li>Can the corporate data on the BYOD be encrypted? If so, who has the passwords and keys? What happens if the passwords or keys are lost or stolen?</li>
<li>Does the BYOD have remote wipe capability? If so, who decides and under what circumstances is it wiped?</li>
<li>How is the data on the BYOD backed up? Does the backup include just corporate data or does it backup everything; including personal information? If it&#8217;s only supposed to back up corporate data how does the line get drawn between personal and corporate data?</li>
<li>What happens to the data on a BYOD if an employee quits or is terminated? Does the company have rights to the entire device or just the data on the device? Even if the company can get access to the BYOD how can they be assured of removing all traces of company data without either destroying the device or destroying personal data of the employee in the process?</li>
<li>Who is responsible for managing the BYOD? If it&#8217;s the company then, the employee won&#8217;t be happy. If it&#8217;s the employee, the company won&#8217;t be happy. If it&#8217;s shared responsibility, then neither will be happy!</li>
<li>Will your IT person commit suicide because of BYOD? BYOD has to be an IT person&#8217;s worst nightmare? They are caught in the middle between the employee and the company and will never be able to make either side 100% happy. Moreover, there&#8217;s absolutely no way that any IT professional can run a secure network if the owners and employees are allowed to be connect BYODs that were on the coffee shop WiFi at lunch or being used to surf porn sites from the hotel network the night before! From the perspective of an IT department, BYOD has to be the worst idea since unsecured WiFi!</li>
</ol>
<p>The above list is in no way comprehensive, but it should get you thinking before you adopt a formal BYOD policy in your company or small business. More importantly, it might also get you to realize that your employees are likely already using their own devices for work even though you have no formal policy as such! Given the downside risks, you now realize you have a lot of work ahead in crafting a formal BYOD policy or some how disentangling yourself from the unofficial BYOD policy you already have established!</p>
<p><strong>Downside for the Employee</strong></p>
<p>One of the big attractions to BYOD from an employee perspective is the notion that they get to use a device that they like, or maybe in the case of Apple&#8217;s products, actually love! The employees are supposedly more productive because they are familiar with the devices and software on them. They also feel comfortable being able to use the social media connections on their favorite device while they are at work. Whether that improves productivity is still up for debate!</p>
<p>As compared to the old days of corporate issued desktop computers and cell phones, BYOD employees feel freedom to take their work where ever they go. They also like not having to lug along two cell phones and two computers every time they travel. At first glance, BYOD actually seems to make sense from an employee perspective but there are still some serious downsides to consider:</p>
<ol>
<li>If you agree to use your device for company business, what rights does your company have to snoop on your machine? Can they read your private files, e-mails, web history? Do they have access to your passwords, your Facebook account?</li>
<li>Do you plan to ask for help from corporate IT when you have problems with the BYOD? If so, then someone in the company will likely have rights to see at least some of the things stored in it&#8217;s memory or hard drive that you might feel are private. Are you really comfortable with that?</li>
<li>Do you share your files from the BYOD on a home network? If so, be careful to turn off those shares when you connect to the corporate network! If you don&#8217;t, your boss, the employees down the hall or in the office across town may be able to snoop through all your private stuff. The same happens when you get home and your kids can see your work files on the home network. Trust me this happens all day long in homes offices around the world so be careful what files and folders you share with your BYOD!</li>
<li>What happens if your BYOD is lost, stolen or broken while you&#8217;re doing company work? Does the company replace it or do you? Ask the same question if the device is lost, stolen or broken while you&#8217;re off the clock? Maybe you&#8217;re better off letting the company buy the device after all?</li>
<li>Does the company have the right to wipe (or remote wipe) the devices? If so, are they wiping just their data or all the data on the device; including your files? How would you feel if your photos, e-mails, texts, etc. were suddenly taken from you because corporate wanted to clear their data?</li>
<li>Does the company backup the BYOD to their network? If so, it most likely is capturing some of your private data too? Do you really want copies of your photos, texts, e-mails, phone numbers, etc. on the company server?</li>
<li>What happens if you quit or are terminated? Does the company have the right to look through your personal device and remove their data before you leave? How will they do that without either seeing or destroying your private data?</li>
<li>Are you taking on added responsibility and / or liability by using your own devices and not a company issued and managed computer or phone? Is the company assuming that you will manage the BYOD according to their standards or yours? If the former, do you know what those standards are? Just because they aren&#8217;t written somewhere doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t exist in the mind of your employer or boss!</li>
<li>Do you let you spouse, children or friends use the BYOD? Do you really think that&#8217;s a good idea if the device has corporate data on it? What happens if one of them inadvertently deletes the corporate data? What happens if they infect the device with a virus or worm that then propagates to the company network? Do you think there&#8217;s any chance you wouldn&#8217;t be fired if something like that happened? You should definitely think twice before letting anyone use a BYOD that contains corporate data!</li>
</ol>
<p>As you can see from this short list there are some serious downsides to the BYOD idea for employees. I&#8217;m sure many of you can think of more situations where having a device with company data in your constant care might not be such a great thing after all even if it means you get to use your iPad at work! I would caution employees to think hard before signing a BYOD type agreement with an employer. More importantly, I would caution you to avoid bringing your devices to work in situations where there is no formal BYOD agreement in place, because in doing so you may find that you&#8217;ve increased your level of risk and responsibility within the company without getting any measurable upside benefits.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>Putting on my small business owner hat, I think the downsides of BYOD more than outweigh the advantages. Hardware is cheap these days. It&#8217;s cheaper to buy and manage good hardware and software for your employees than it is to attempt to manage the enormous diversity of devices that your employees might bring to the job. If employees insist that certain types of hardware or software helps their productivity, then just buy and manage it for them and insist that it&#8217;s for company use only. If you do this, your IT department will thank you, and will be able to do a better job for you. By limiting the scope of hardware and software on the corporate network, and limiting their responsibility to only devices owned and operated by the company, your IT guy or gal will have a better chance of creating and maintaining a secure and reliable corporate network and keeping employees happy too.</p>
<p>From the employee perspective, I think it&#8217;s also clear that you don&#8217;t want to entangle your personal devices with company networks or politics. You&#8217;re better off to ask that the company give you the tools and devices you need to do your job. If you then use these devices only for work related activities you will never have to worry about your private data and what should happen should your employer get hold of it.</p>
<p><strong>Note</strong></p>
<p>I decided to blog on this topic after hearing of several incidents lately where employees were using their own personal computers at a company operating in a health related field. It seemed that the company in question didn&#8217;t have a BYOD policy and the IT people were not actively managing the BYODs for security threats. I felt that this unwritten policy could eventually leave the company in a pickle should there be data breach resulting in a HIPPA violation as a result of the BYODs. I expect this is happening a lot of places with out anyone really thinking about the ramifications for either company or employees. I&#8217;m sure many of you reading this are facing similar situations. I&#8217;d be interested to hear how you are managing the issue. Comments welcome!</p>
<p>JR</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1458</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Cyber War by Richard A. Clarke and Robert K. Knake</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1455&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=book-review-cyber-war-by-richard-a-clarke-and-robert-k-knake</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1455#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyber war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On line banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The book <a href="http://astore.amazon.com/securbeaco-20/detail/0061962244" target="_blank">Cyber War by Richard A. Clarke and Robert K. Knake</a> is a wakeup call targeting our elected representatives and military leaders.  It should also be a wakeup call to all those people and business owners who neglect security issues in their IT infrastructure.</p> <p>The book begins by providing background on how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book <a href="http://astore.amazon.com/securbeaco-20/detail/0061962244" target="_blank">Cyber War by Richard A. Clarke and Robert K. Knake</a> is a wakeup call targeting our elected representatives and military leaders.  It should also be a wakeup call to all those people and business owners who neglect security issues in their IT infrastructure.</p>
<p>The book begins by providing background on how we have come to the point in history where nearly anyone from nearly anywhere in the world can launch a cyber attack on people, businesses and governments on the other side of the planet at nearly the speed of light. Clarke highlights known cases of cyber attacks, sabotage, and theft and how it is dramatically changing the security landscape for countries and businesses around the world.</p>
<p>Clarke&#8217;s main concern is that the US has approached cyber war using primarily offensive minded thinking in much the same way that they thought about atomic weapons in the post WWII ear. Indeed, the US has some of the best cyber warriors in the world, but what should be the policy of how and where to use such forces? What would be the result of a first strike type cyber assault on another nation? How would the US defend itself from similar attacks launched from afar and from within the US? How do we escalate or deescalate a cyber conflict? When would escalation lead to a shooting war? Clarke argues that these are questions that everyone from the top brass to the average civilian should be thinking about given the grave risks that cyber attacks now pose to everyone.</p>
<p>Clarke makes the case that the US is the most technologically advanced nation on earth and has the most to lose should a serious cyber conflict erupt. He then points out that the US does not now have a clear policy regarding cyber warfare. The free and open Internet therefore ensures that anyone from anywhere can launch an attack at anytime with the knowledge that the US government has limited capacity to defend against the attack. In fact, the government does not currently have a sound policy or the ability to intervene should critical infrastructure such as financial markets and the power grid come under cyber attack.  It is therefore left to private companies to protect their own networks and infrastructures from what, in some cases, could amount to attacks from foreign regimes, criminals or terrorists.</p>
<p>In other words, if a cyber war breaks out you, and I and everyone else are effectively on our own! Unlike many other &#8220;the sky is falling&#8221; books, Clarke also brings specific recommendations and policies, that if adopted, would help reduce the risk of cyber war starting and escalating and limit the amount of damage such a conflict might have on the home front.</p>
<p>Overall, I found this book an excellent and well written account of where we stand with regards to cyber war at in early 2012. Hopefully it&#8217;s timely publication will precipitate a serious discussion in the halls of congress, and wake up some small business owners to the issue of IT security before it&#8217;s too late.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1455</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transitioning to Xubuntu 12.04</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1449&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=transitioning-to-xubuntu-12-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1449#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux and Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backuppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dropbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction</p> <p>I&#8217;ve used Ubuntu Linux on my computers since 2007.  While no OS is perfect, Ubuntu has been a good fit for what I do and I can generally live with its shortcomings. After five years, I can say that switching to Ubuntu was a good deal for me and my business. I have better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used Ubuntu Linux on my computers since 2007.  While no OS is perfect, Ubuntu has been a good fit for what I do and I can generally live with its shortcomings. After five years, I can say that switching to Ubuntu was a good deal for me and my business. I have better security and spend less time and money dealing with software issues than I did before.</p>
<p>As most of you know, last month Canonical, Inc. released the latest update of Ubuntu known as Precise Pangolin or 12.04 LTS (Long Term Service). This release is controversial as a result of the move from the now defunct Gnome 2 desktop. Debate about the new Unity and Gnome 3 versus the Gnome 2 environment has taken up considerable bandwidth in the last year. I won&#8217;t add much to that discussion except to say that I haven&#8217;t yet found either of the new desktop options to suit my style. That doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m ready to jump ship from Ubuntu however. Ubuntu still offers a good mix of support and compatibility along with a lot of options that are hard to beat.</p>
<p>That said, I still considered other options before opting to stay in the Ubuntu camp. I looked hard at Debian Squeeze but I wanted newer kernels and the latest Firefox and Thunderbird. Linux Mint and it&#8217;s related Debian Edition also looked like a very compelling option until I discovered that they don&#8217;t yet offer Full Disk Encryption as part of the standard setup. Without easy encryption Mint is a non-starter. My issue was not Ubuntu as a whole but the new desktops. As an experiment, I loaded an early beta release of Xubuntu 12.04 on one of my netbooks so that I could check both the desktop and compatibility with certain software packages that are key to my operation. There were definitely a few bugs but most of those have been resolved in the final release.</p>
<p>The big surprise was the Xfce based desktop. Xfce was originally based on what is known as CDE (Common Desktop Environment) that was used on Unix workstations in the 1990&#8242;s. I was very familiar with CDE through my use of Sun and HP workstations of that era. Even though Xfce is substantially newer it still has a familiar feel. Out of the box, the Xubuntu desktop looks a bit different from the Gnome 2 based Ubuntu desktop, but it is very easy to configure and you can easily make it look and act like your old desktop whether you&#8217;re coming from an older Ubuntu release or even Windows XP! Even though some things aren&#8217;t as smooth as Gnome 2, I liked it enough that I have since adopted Xubuntu across all of my machines.</p>
<p>In the next part of this article, I&#8217;m going to document some of the minor workarounds I found for various bugs and paper cuts in the Xubuntu 12.04 release in the hopes that they save others time and fuss chasing them down.</p>
<p><strong>Black Screen on First Startup</strong></p>
<p>I use the alternate CD installer and fully encrypt all my machines. I noticed that I would sometimes get a black screen on first reboot after a fresh install. This was disturbing, but I blindly entered the pass-phrase anyway and the system starts and brings you to a normal login. After running the post install updates the problem seems to resolve and you can see the prompt for the pass-phrase on subsequent boots.</p>
<p><strong>VMWare Patch</strong></p>
<p>VMWare Workstation 8.02 and Player 4.02 won&#8217;t install properly due to a problem compiling the vmnet kernel module. Fortunately, there is a patch that resolves the problem. You can get it here:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://askubuntu.com/questions/116565/unable-to-install-vmware-workstation-v8">http://askubuntu.com/questions/116565/unable-to-install-vmware-workstation-v8</a></p>
<p>Hopefully the next release from VMWare will resolve the issue permanently.</p>
<p><strong>Right Click with eGalaxTouch Screen</strong></p>
<p>I have an Asus 901 netbook with an eGalaxTouch Touch Screen. The touch screen operates out of the box except that it doesn&#8217;t offer a right-click simulation when holding down the stylus. To add this function and the ability to calibrate the touch screen you first install xinput-calibrator package:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo apt-get install xinput-calibrator</p>
<p>Next calibrate the screen by running:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo xinput-calibrator</p>
<p>Copy the output snippet to the file /usr/share/X11/xorg-conf.d/99-calibration.conf .</p>
<p>Edit the file to add Option lines as shown below for EmulateThirdButton. Your file should look something like this:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Section &#8220;InputClass&#8221;<br />
Identifier &#8220;calibration&#8221;<br />
MatchProduct &#8220;eGalax INC. USB TouchController&#8221;<br />
Option &#8220;Calibration&#8221; &#8220;6 4067 27 4070&#8243;<br />
Option &#8220;EmulateThirdButton&#8221; &#8220;1&#8243;<br />
Option &#8220;EmulateThirdButtonTimeout&#8221; &#8220;750&#8243;<br />
Option &#8220;EmulateThirdButtonThreshold&#8221; &#8220;30&#8243;<br />
EndSection</p>
<p>You may have to restart the desktop to have the changes take effect.</p>
<p><strong>Missing Hibernate Settings</strong></p>
<p>Hibernate is disabled by default. See this link for instructions on enabling it:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/ubuntu-help/power-hibernate.html">https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/ubuntu-help/power-hibernate.html</a></p>
<p>If you want a secure notebook be sure to configure power settings to hibernate when you close the lid.</p>
<p><strong>Disable Guest Account</strong></p>
<p>By default, the Xubuntu login screen has the guest account enabled. You can disable it by adding &#8220;allow-guest=false&#8221; to the &#8220;SetDefaults&#8221; section of the file /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf .</p>
<p><strong>Samba and Backuppc Bug</strong></p>
<p>I noticed that I couldn&#8217;t get reliable backups using Samba shares and Backuppc. I am not 100% certain, but I believe that the problem is related to this bug in Samba:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753531" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753531</a></p>
<p>I only backup Linux machines so my work around was to reconfigure backuppc to use rsync instead of the Samba shares. If you rely on backuppc to backup Windows machines you may want to explore this issue further before jumping to newer Linux distributions of any kind as I don&#8217;t think this bug is limited to just Ubuntu.</p>
<p><strong>DVD&#8217;s Won&#8217;t Play</strong></p>
<p>Do the following:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo apt-get install xubuntu-restricted-extras</p>
<p>and then this to install the codecs: (I have no idea why this isn&#8217;t done automatically?)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo /usr/share/doc/libdvdread4/install-css.sh</p>
<p><strong>Floppy Drives not Detected<br />
</strong></p>
<p>See my notes <a title="Finally! A fix for an annoying floppy disk bug in Ubuntu / Debian Linux – Updated" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1110">here</a>. They still work for 12.04.</p>
<p><strong>Dropbox</strong></p>
<p>I experienced issues installing Dropbox on 64-bit systems. I think this is resolved now, but if you have trouble be sure to use the latest Dropbox installer.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s still early, but so far I&#8217;m very pleased with this Xubuntu release. If you&#8217;re not sure about Unity or Gnome 3 but otherwise like the Ubuntu model, I suggest you try Xubuntu. It has support and security updates until April 2015 so you won&#8217;t be forced into another upgrade for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1449</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence of E-mail tampering?</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1442&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=evidence-of-e-mail-tampering</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1442#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Timing on a password reset request suggests hackers are monitoring payment confirmation e-mails.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 10:03 PM last night I received a confirmation e-mail from a service provider showing that they had automatically renewed my subscription. The confirmation e-mail was legitimate and included an invoice number, my name, my user name, my address and the last four digits of a credit card. This is nothing out of the ordinary.  I&#8217;m sure that most of you get similar e-mails all the time as you go about your business shopping on the web.</p>
<p><strong><em>Now for the scary part&#8230;</em></strong></p>
<p>Less than 5 minutes later I received another e-mail from the same service provider notifying me that someone had requested to reset of my password. The e-mail indicated that if it wasn&#8217;t me that requested the change I should simply ignore the message and the request would time out in 48 hours.  If I did request it, all I had to do was click a link to confirm I actually made the request. The e-mail also included the IP address from which the password change request was initiated. Of course I had made no such request. I subsequently did a reverse DNS lookup on the IP address and found it was from a network in Australia! Given the timing, I think it&#8217;s obvious that this attempt to hack the account was triggered by someone intercepting the unsecured e-mail sent from the web service provider.</p>
<p>Even though all of this was a benign incident, it clearly demonstrates the fact that anything you send in an open e-mail can be intercepted and potentially used against you. Just another reminder that if something is really important you don&#8217;t send it via unencrypted e-mail.</p>
<p>If you aren&#8217;t yet using a form of encrypted e-mail (e.g. PGP, S/MIME, Voltage, HushMail, etc.) you may wish to review some of my previous posts on the topic. You may also want to review our <a title="Security Check List" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?page_id=190" target="_blank">Security Check List</a> for other tips on reducing your security risks.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1442</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Medicaid Server Hacked &#8211; Over 800,000 People Now at Risk! Updated!</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1435&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=utah-medicaid-server-hacked-over-800000-people-now-at-risk</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1435#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hackers broke into a server and stole the Social Security Numbers of some 280,000 Utahans. They also made off with the less sensitive information (e.g. names &#038; birth date, etc.) of another 500,000 people. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This one is going to be huge!</p>
<p>The State of Utah wasn&#8217;t &#8220;minding the store&#8221; and hackers broke into a server and stole the Social Security Numbers of some 280,000 Utahans. They also made off with the less sensitive information (e.g. names &amp; birth date, etc.) of another 500,000 people.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53879423-78/breach-health-information-medicaid.html.csp" target="_blank">April 9, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Scope of Utah Medicaid data breach explodes </a></p>
<p>I have been reading more and more lately about the threat of cyber war and how the US is drastically unprepared to defend itself in cyberspace. The article above indicates that they traced the hackers as far as eastern Europe suggesting it has an international flavor. Though Europe may not necessarily be the launching point for the attack there is certainly a nexus of hacking activity originating from the region. One could imagine that perpetrators are linked to organized crime and maybe even backed by a foreign government. It will be interesting to see how this one plays out given that it was aimed at a State agency and the FBI is now involved.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that it will be very difficult for the average person to defend themselves against the types of attacks that may be coming in future cyber war conflicts. The good news is that most of the time people go after the lowest hanging fruit. That means that if you&#8217;re smart and take some basic steps there&#8217;s a good chance they will move on to easier targets. See our <a title="Security Check List" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?page_id=190" target="_blank">Check List</a> for a quick overview of things you can do to help raise the bar.</p>
<p><strong>Updated May 18, 2012</strong></p>
<p>More than a month later and this hack and the resulting political fall out is still big news here in Utah. My friend Kristen Stewart and others at the Salt Lake Tribune have written a series of articles help people understand what happened and what it means to their private data. I encourage you to read them so that you know what is happening and how your data may have been impacted.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53888058-78/data-information-medicaid-breach.html.csp" target="_blank">April 10, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Utah Gov. Herbert vows patch Medicaid data breach, restore trust</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53892081-78/data-health-security-state.html.csp?page=1" target="_blank">April 12, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Did Utah&#8217;s failure to protect health data violate federal law?</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/53980446-78/health-medicaid-information-breach.html.csp" target="_blank">April 26, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Victim of Utah health data breach? You&#8217;re not alone</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/53904742-79/utah-department-information-breach.html.csp" target="_blank">April 13, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Utah Medicaid data breach brings scam warning</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/54037017-78/health-security-department-patton.html.csp" target="_blank">May 2, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Utah Health Dept chief: hacked data stored too long</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/54109368-78/health-breach-utah-medicaid.html.csp" target="_blank">May 14, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Utah hiring crisis team to manage health data breach</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/54116598-78/information-state-data-health.html.csp" target="_blank">May 16, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: Utah guv fires tech director over health data breach, creates security czar</a></p>
<p>Even if you don&#8217;t have time to read all these articles you&#8217;ll want to at least go here:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://health.utah.gov/" target="_blank">health.utah.gov</a></p>
<p>and find out if your data was compromised.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1435</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Outgunned in Hacker War</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1432&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=u-s-outgunned-in-hacker-war</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1432#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A link to a WSJ article where Mr. Shawn Henry from the FBI discusses how badly things are going in the cyber war.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we see an article from a top FBI official indicating just how bad the cyber security issue has become:</p>
<p><a href="U.S. Outgunned in Hacker War " target="_blank">March 28, 2012 &#8211; Wall Street Journal: U.S. Outgunned in Hacker War</a></p>
<p>According to Mr. Henry:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em><strong>&#8220;companies need to make major changes in the way they use computer networks to avoid further damage to national security and the economy. Too many companies, from major multinationals to small start-ups, fail to recognize the financial and legal risks they are taking—or the costs they may have already suffered unknowingly—by operating vulnerable networks&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. My sense is that very few companies really get &#8220;security&#8221;. I know of major multinationals that outsource their IT and security to some of the big name service providers, yet they still have major security holes. I also know owners of small to medium-sized businesses that, while they know they have a problem, just don&#8217;t have the foggiest notion of what to do to begin solving the problem. In my experience, the average home user is simply in the dark concerning computer and network security.</p>
<p>Mr. Henry also indicated that:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><em>&#8220;there are some things companies need to change to create more secure computer networks. He said their most valuable data should be kept off the network altogether. He cited the recent case of a hack on an unidentified company in which he said 10 years worth of research and development, valued at more than $1 billion, was stolen by hackers.&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p>This is not the first time I&#8217;ve read of cases where hackers have carried off decades and billions of dollars worth of R&amp;D. It is happening all the time. See my <a title="Book Review: AMERICA THE VULNERABLE by Joel Brenner" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1232" target="_blank">book review on &#8220;America the Vulnerable&#8221;</a> if you want to learn more.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1432</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salt Lake City may adopt fines for &#8220;distracted walking&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1430&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=salt-lake-city-may-adopt-fines-for-distracted-walking</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1430#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell / Smart Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salt Lake City's UTA board has voted to impose a $50 civil fine for distracted walking around UTA rail lines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an earlier post I&#8217;ve made it clear that the number one rule for mobile phone security is <a title="Top Security Rules for your mobile phone! Updated!" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1374" target="_blank">&#8220;just put the damn phone down and drive&#8221;</a>. In an update to that post, I even provided a link to a story where a Michigan woman had to be rescued because she walked off a pier and into a lake while distracted by texting on her mobile phone! The lesson there was that &#8220;distracted walking&#8221; can be just as bad as &#8220;distracted driving&#8221;. The problem isn&#8217;t limited to piers in Michigan however.</p>
<p>According to this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/53811747-90/board-distracted-fines-ordinance.html.cs" target="_blank">March 28, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: ‘Distracted walking’ by rails may now bring fines </a></p>
<p>the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) board has apparently concluded that &#8220;distracted walking&#8221; is leading to accidents involving pedestrians and UTA TRAX and FrontRunner trains. So, after a rash of recent incidents, UTA board members &#8220;voted 11-3 to create a $50 civil fine for distracted walking around UTA rail lines, and repeat offenses would cost $100.&#8221; The fines would not be limited just to texting and talking on mobile phones but would also include listening to music with headphones, attending to personal hygiene and reading newspapers and magazines while crossing train rails.</p>
<p>I generally think laws and ordinances like these are ridiculous but the UTA board apparently felt they needed to do something to build awareness of the risks of mindlessly walking into the path of an oncoming train!</p>
<p>If only people would be as willing to use their brains to the same degree they seem to be willing to use their mobile phones (and other gizmos) none of this would even be an issue!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1430</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Easy to Use Encrypted E-mail Services</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1255&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-easy-to-use-encrypted-e-mail-services</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1255#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Encrypted e-mails currently make up less than 5% of all e-mails sent worldwide every day. That means most people are NOT using encryption. By adopting and using any form of e-mail encryption you raise the bar high enough that the majority of hackers simply move on to easier targets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I put together a post on <a title="Voltage SecureMail Cloud – An easy way to send encrypted e-mail to anyone!" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1393" target="_blank">an easy to use encrypted e-mail service known as Voltage SecureMail Cloud</a>. I showed how this service allows you to send an encrypted e-mail to just about anyone without worrying about what kind of e-mail client/server they use, or fussing with the particulars of PGP versus S/MIME, and generating/buying, exchanging and installing the appropriate keys. I made the case that service from Voltage is ideal when you have to send encrypted e-mail to many different people; especially people for whom you don&#8217;t have a public key.</p>
<p>After I made the post however I started to wonder if there were alternatives that could also offer similar ease of use and security. Naturally, I found a few options and I thought I&#8217;d describe them briefly in this post.</p>
<p>I read somewhere recently that encrypted e-mails now make up less than 5% of all e-mails sent worldwide every day. That means there is a lot of data floating around out there that can be mined by those with the tools and ability to exploit it. It also means that if you start using any form of e-mail encryption whatsoever you are suddenly at the head of the class!  Just like locking your doors and taking the keys to the car, any form of e-mail encryption raises the bar just high enough so that most hackers and others that might do you harm will simply move on to easier  targets!</p>
<p>On that note, I&#8217;m purposely NOT going to delve into the relative security of one service versus another since the goal here is to get people to adopt and use ANY system that offers security better than a simple open e-mail.</p>
<p>So here is a list, in no particular order, of some of the e-mail encryption services that might offer some ease of use advantages over the traditional PGP and S/MIME software. The information listed was garnered from the web sites. Please don&#8217;t take my word for it, go and check it all out for yourself. Note that I have not tried these services and I am not endorsing them. I am only suggesting them as possible options that would give you better security than what you might have now; which is most likely nothing!  I urge you to carefully review their terms of service and to do some testing to decide if they truly meet your needs.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.voltage.com/products/securemail.htm" target="_blank">http://www.voltage.com/products/securemail.htm</a></li>
<ul>
<li>Previously discussed <a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1393" target="_blank">here</a>.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://senditsecure.com/home.aspx" target="_blank">http://senditsecure.com/home.aspx</a></li>
<ul>
<li>Offers free associate account that is limited to 5 sends per month. That&#8217;s impractically small except for purposes of trying out the service.</li>
<li>Business edition account starts at $10/month.</li>
<li>Works with any OS or browser, even mobile devices</li>
<li>Outlook integration</li>
<li>256-bit AES encryption</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.hushmail.com/" target="_blank">http://www.hushmail.com/</a></li>
<ul>
<li>Offers free @hushmail.com account.</li>
<li>Premium, Desktop and Forms accounts range from $35 to $85 per year and offer encrypted file storage and e-mail aliases.</li>
<li>Encrypted e-mails sent to users without hushmail accounts are sent using a secret question / answer. This could be cumbersome if you send to a lot of people outside hushmail&#8217;s system.</li>
<li>Works with any OS, e-mail client, webmail, mobile devices</li>
<li>Outlook integration</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://s-mail.com/" target="_blank">http://s-mail.com/</a></li>
<ul>
<li>Standard subscription roughly $3/month, Premium subscription for roughly $5/month</li>
<li>User must install proprietary S-Mail application on the local machine. The application is distributed as a zipped .exe file.</li>
<li>Despite claims of Linux compatibility, as near as I can determine the .exe only works on Windows machines! If I am correct on this, then you won&#8217;t be able to send encrypted e-mail to people using other systems.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.comodo.com/home/email-security/secure-email.php" target="_blank">http://www.comodo.com/home/email-security/secure-email.php</a></li>
<ul>
<li>Works with various e-mail clients (e.g. Outlook, Eudora, Thunderbird) but only on Windows OS. This could be a drawback if you need to send encrypted e-mail to people that use other operating systems.</li>
<li>Outlook integration</li>
<li>Free for personal use. Business versions available.</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>If you have opinions on these or other similar services please feel free to add your thoughts in the comment section. Thanks!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1255</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent ID Theft Related Articles &#8211; Updated</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1413&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=recent-id-theft-related-articles</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1413#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID Theft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ID theft is a major problem. Everyone, including the super rich and powerful, is a potential target. Children are particularly vulnerable. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ID theft is a huge problem these days and something about which everyone needs to be concerned. In the last couple of days I&#8217;ve just run into several interesting articles that I thought might get you thinking about the problem.</p>
<p>The first article demonstrates that everyone is at risk, including wealthy and powerful, to ID theft. In this case, someone tried to steal the identity of Paul Allen, co-founder of Microsoft:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/53800262-79/allen-complaint-account-founder.html.csp" target="_blank">March 27, 2012 &#8211; Salt Lake Tribune: FBI: AWOL solider tried to steal Microsoft co-founder&#8217;s identity</a></p>
<p>The second article outlines how ID thieves are targeting children because their slates are clean and their credit records are often not monitored or checked for years. The article cites one instance were an ID was stolen when the child was only 4 years old but the theft wasn&#8217;t discovered until she was 19 and trying to get her own apartment. I have to admit that I wouldn&#8217;t have thought this would be a problem but I&#8217;m now going to be watching more closely to try to save my daughter a big headache down the road.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.smartmoney.com/advice/2012/03/26/29-a-month-to-protect-kids-from-id-theft/" target="_blank">March 26, 2012 &#8211; smartmoney.com: $29 a Month to Protect Kids from ID Theft?</a></p>
<p>Lastly, I stumbled across an older but still relevant pair of articles on things that an identity thief won&#8217;t tell you. Pay particular attention to how they make use of your mailbox, your trash, and unusual looking devices attached to the ATM. If you haven&#8217;t done so already, you should consider buying a shredder and a locked mailbox. You also want to commit PIN codes to memory, rather than writing them on slips of paper that you keep in your wallet or purse.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rd.com/13-things/13-things-an-identity-thief-wont-tell-you/?obref=obnetwork" target="_blank">September 2010 &#8211; Reader&#8217;s Digest: 13 Things An Identity Thief Won’t Tell You</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rd.com/13-things/13-more-things-an-identity-thief-wont-tell-you/" target="_blank">September 2010 &#8211; Reader&#8217;s Digest: 13 More Things An Identity Thief Won&#8217;t Tell You</a></p>
<p><strong>Update March 28, 2012 </strong></p>
<p>These two articles suggest that the credit bureaus themselves may not be your best friend when it comes to ID theft. The first one points out how the bureaus try to sell services rather than actually help someone who&#8217;s ID has been stolen.</p>
<p><a href="http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/23/10816820-credit-bureaus-upsell-id-theft-victims-ftc-report-says" target="_blank">March 23, 2012 &#8211; MSNBC Red Tape : Credit bureaus upsell ID theft victims, FTC report says</a></p>
<p>This one shows how &#8220;Websites that offer consumers a chance to see their credit reports are being brazenly used by hackers to steal victims&#8217; information.&#8221; The hackers are able to get the information by taking advantage of relatively lax security questions and protocols.</p>
<p><a href="http://redtape.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/26/10875023-exclusive-hackers-turn-credit-report-websites-against-consumers" target="_blank">March 26, 2012 &#8211; MSNBC Red Tape &#8211; EXCLUSIVE: Hackers turn credit report websites against consumers</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not already doing so you probably want to check your credit report once a year. You can get one free credit report per year by going to this site:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.annualcreditreport.com" target="_blank">https://www.annualcreditreport.com</a></p>
<p>After you enter some basic information you can select a report from one of the three major reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion). I did this myself this morning. As the Red Tape article indicates the security questions were definitely weak. Most of the information I found in my report was accurate but I did have to file a dispute with an old address they had on file. The dispute process was easy but takes up to 45 days.</p>
<p>If you are concerned about ID theft you may also want to visit our <a title="Security Check List" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?page_id=190">Security Check List</a> to find other ways to make your digital life more secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1413</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voltage SecureMail Cloud &#8211; An easy way to send encrypted e-mail to anyone!</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1393&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=voltage-securemail-cloud-an-easy-way-to-send-encrypted-e-mail-to-anyone</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1393#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voltage SecureMail offers an easy way to send encrypted e-mail to anyone! Bypass the complication of set-up and key management with this slick secure e-mail system.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Risks</strong></p>
<p>As I have discussed <a title="Encrypted E-mail" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=12">here</a> before, anything you send in open (i.e. unencrypted) e-mail is effectively public domain the instant you hit the send button. This can be bad for a variety of reasons. For example, let&#8217;s suppose you have several subcontractors working for you and they are under NDA (non-disclosure agreement) with your firm. If you send a proprietary report or spreadsheet through open e-mail it could easily be argued that said report or spreadsheet is no longer proprietary and covered under your NDA simply because you sent it in unsecured e-mail. Similarly, if your subcontractors are sending your proprietary information via open e-mail, they may be in violation of an NDA for &#8220;using less than a reasonable standard of care&#8221; with your data.</p>
<p><strong>The blurb</strong></p>
<p>I know many of you have your e-mail clients configured to automatically attach a confidentiality notice, otherwise known as a &#8220;lawyer blurb&#8221;, such as this:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message and any included attachments contain information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any dissemination, publication or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. The sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail. Thank you.</em></p>
<p>at the bottom of every e-mail you send.  While I am definitely not qualified to dispense legal advice, I can tell you that attaching the &#8220;blurb&#8221; to every e-mail will NOT stop someone in China or other parts of the world, outside the reach of the US legal system, from stealing your ideas and information! Moreover, it will likely have little or no impact on those in the US either, unless you actually catch them and file suit against them.</p>
<p>Bottom line: If you are sending things in e-mail that really need to have a &#8220;lawyer blurb&#8221; you had better use encryption too!</p>
<p><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p>There are now two widely used system for e-mail encryption. The first is known as PGP, the second S/MIME. Some people will argue about the advantages and disadvantages of each method, but in my opinion both systems can be used to adequately protect your data from prying eyes. The biggest disadvantage of both systems is that they are incompatible with each other! That means if you are serious about using encryption, and you work with a variety of people across different companies, you will likely need to install both systems. Personally, I didn&#8217;t find this very difficult, but it has been my experience that setting up PGP or S/MIME can be a real stumbling block for many people and organizations. In fact, I would say that as a general rule it is very difficult to get people to use encrypted e-mail even if you are trying to help them protect their data!</p>
<p>As an example, I recently suggested to a potential client that they should use S/MIME because of terms in an NDA that we had signed. After several weeks of having their &#8220;corporate IT person&#8221; e-mail me questions and test e-mails, they were unable to get S/MIME to work properly. In frustration, I finally suggested to the engineer I was working with that we <a title="Use Dropbox instead of e-mail attachments to improve security" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=220">share proprietary files using Dropbox instead of using e-mail attachments</a>. We limited e-mail to non-proprietary and simple &#8220;see the new file in Dropbox&#8221; messages. That worked out fine, but it left me convinced that e-mail encryption is harder for the average person and small business owner than I had initially thought.</p>
<p><strong>The New Alternative</strong></p>
<p>Late last year, a friend sent me a tip to look into a service known as <a href="http://www.voltage.com/" target="_blank">Voltage Secure E-mail</a>. The company offers an interesting twist on e-mail encryption that seems to get rid of some of the headaches and frustration of configuring encrypted e-mail using the traditional methods. I will outline how it all works below, but you can skip this and just try a demo by clicking here: <a href="http://www.voltage.com/vsn/freetrial.htm" target="_blank">Voltage SecureMail Cloud Free Trial</a>.</p>
<p>The first thing that was obviously different about Voltage was that my friend was able to send me an encrypted e-mail without first exchanging a set of keys or certificates. This is an essential step with S/MIME and PGP and often the thing that causes the most confusion and problems.</p>
<p>The message that I had in my Thunderbird Inbox looked like this:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1396" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 683px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEmail1.png"><img class=" wp-image-1396" title="Voltage Secured E-mail Message " src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEmail1.png" alt="Voltage Secured E-mail Message " width="673" height="911" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage Secured E-mail Message</p></div></p>
<p>I clicked on the button &#8220;Read Message&#8221; and I was then directed to the Voltage web site and this message:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1397" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEmail2.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1397" title="Voltage Secure E-mail Step 2" src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEmail2-300x143.png" alt="Voltage Secure E-mail Step 2" width="300" height="143" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage Secure E-mail Step 2</p></div></p>
<p>I went back to Thunderbird and forwarded the message per the instructions. Within a minute I received an e-mail with an SSL (https://) link shown here:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1398" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEmail3.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1398" title="Voltage Secure E-mail Step 3" src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEmail3-300x123.png" alt="Voltage Secure E-mail Step 3" width="300" height="123" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage Secure E-mail Step 3</p></div></p>
<p>Clicking the link brought me to a page that looked like this:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1400" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail4.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1400" title="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 4" src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail4-300x296.png" alt="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 4" width="300" height="296" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 4</p></div></p>
<p>I used <a title="Password Mangement" href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=14" target="_blank">Keypass password manager</a> to generate a good password and created the account. I was then presented with this screen:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1401" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail5.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1401" title="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 5" src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail5-300x248.png" alt="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 5" width="300" height="248" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 5</p></div></p>
<p>Sure enough within about a minute I had an e-mail in my Thunderbird Inbox like this:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1402" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail6.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1402" title="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 6" src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail6-300x156.png" alt="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 6" width="300" height="156" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 6</p></div></p>
<p>Clicking the link enabled me to read the decrypted message in Firefox as shown here:</p>
<p><div id="attachment_1403" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail7.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1403" title="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 7" src="http://www.securitybeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/VoltageEMail7-300x229.png" alt="Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 7" width="300" height="229" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Voltage SecureMail Cloud Step 7</p></div></p>
<p>As you can see above, it was then easy to correspond with my friend using encrypted e-mail without going through the complicated process of buying, installing, generating and sharing S/MIME or PGP keys.</p>
<p>It strikes me that the Voltage SecureMail offers a number of advantages to S/MIME and PGP. If I had to send a lot of encrypted e-mails to a lot of different people on different systems, Voltage SecureMail is definitely the system to use. You immediately sidestep the long process of negotiating with each recipient about PGP versus S/MIME, and getting keys exchanged and installed properly. You eliminate worries about what e-mail client they use, since Voltage can run on any e-mail system &#8211; even G-mail for which S/MIME and PGP aren&#8217;t really options. If your friends or clients use Outlook, Voltage provides a downloadable plug-in that makes the process of using their system on that platform even easier and more seamless. (Note: I use Linux so I have NOT tested the plug-in. I would appreciate feed back here if any of you have tried it.)</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>Based on what I have seen so far, I would describe the sweet spots for the various secure e-mail strategies as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>PGP</strong> &#8211; Best security for a small group, but more difficult to set-up and use. Lowest cost.</li>
<li><strong>S/MIME</strong> &#8211; Not quite as secure as PGP, but easier to install and use. Better for medium to large groups. Medium cost.</li>
<li><strong>Voltage SecureMail</strong> &#8211; Outstanding option for large and diverse groups. Easiest to configure and use. Highest cost.</li>
</ul>
<p>Voltage SecureMail is offered on a subscription basis for $65 per year. Even though you can generate your own PGP keys for free or buy an S/MIME cert from Verisign for $19 per year, I think it&#8217;s still a good value because it gives you a hassle free way to communicate with <strong>anyone</strong> using secured e-mail. You won&#8217;t have to pester your clients or friends to adopt and use one of the other systems, and you won&#8217;t waste your time trying to talk them through all the set-up and configuration issues.</p>
<p>Ultimately, I don&#8217;t think Voltage will replace either PGP or S/MIME for my existing clients or even new ones where I&#8217;m doing a lot of encrypted e-mail. On the other hand, I think it&#8217;s a great option when I need to quickly send someone that I don&#8217;t normally communicate with a secure e-mail. It may even prove to be the right alternative for those clients who are otherwise resistant to adopting and using S/MIME or PGP.</p>
<p>Again, give it a try. Let me hear your feed back!</p>
<p>JR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1393</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Browse the Web Anonymously using Free Tor Browser Package</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1386&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=browse-the-web-anonymously-using-free-tor-browser-package</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1386#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux and Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On line banking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download the free Tor browser package to your Mac, PC or smart phone to enjoy the benefits of anonymous web browsing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably know by now, nearly anything you do on the web can be monitored to one degree or another. When doing online banking or shopping it&#8217;s a good idea to use what is known as SSL to encrypt the session and prevent others from stealing your bank and credit card info. While SSL is a good step, there remain other risks. For example, even with an SSL session it is still possible that a person, company, agency or government can watch and analyze the traffic between your computer or network and the rest of the world and over time learn things about you and your business that you probably don&#8217;t want them to know. This is particularly important in regions of the world where government monitors and controls web activity. To make life harder for those that wish to monitor our every move, the good people at the <a href="https://www.torproject.org/" target="_blank">Tor project</a> have created free and open source software and an open network to help you remain anonymous as you browse the web.</p>
<p>At some point I&#8217;m going to discuss Tor in more depth, but for now, the best advice I can give you is to go to their site and download what is known as the <a href="https://www.torproject.org/download/download.html.en" target="_blank">&#8220;Tor Browser Bundle&#8221;</a> for your particular OS. There are bundles for Windows, Mac, Linux and even Android and Apple smart phones. To use the software you simply download and extract the compressed bundle at a convenient place on your hard drive and then find and execute the file &#8220;Start-tor-browser&#8221;. The script will start all the relevant Tor software. Once you are connected to the Tor network, a Firefox browser will be launched and the first page will confirm the connection and show you the IP address you appear to be browsing from. Anything you do from here on out in that session is anonymous and nearly impossible to intercept and monitor. You will notice that the response time is slower than your normal connection due to the overhead of bouncing through various nodes in the Tor network, but you will be assured that what you are doing is between you and the site you are visiting and not a third-party. You will also notice that certain browser features and plug-ins are disabled. This is done to help ensure your privacy and anonymity so I wouldn&#8217;t recommend changing the settings unless you REALLY know what you are doing.</p>
<p>I highly recommend you download the Tor browser package to all of your machines and start enjoying a safer web browsing experience today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1386</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Security Rules for your mobile phone! Updated!</title>
		<link>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1374&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-security-rules-for-your-mobile-phone</link>
		<comments>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1374#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3G / 4G networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell / Smart Phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitybeacon.com/?p=1374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule #1 - JUST PUT THE DAMN PHONE DOWN AND DRIVE!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security Beacon was started to help the average home user and small business owner become aware of, and then mitigate, some of the security risks associated with modern electronic devices such as computers and mobile phones. Our articles on such things as backup strategy, password management, encryption, firewalls, etc. are all aimed at helping you avoid having a bad day due to loss, theft or hacking of one of your digital devices. In the big picture of life though a hard drive crash or computer virus is just a minor inconvenience. Today, I am going to give you advice that can save you, your loved ones, and your friends and colleagues from having a truly tragic day or maybe even a last day among the living.</p>
<p><strong>Security Rules for your mobile phone:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>Rule #1 &#8211; Do NOT use a mobile phone while you&#8217;re driving!  That means NO texting, NO talking, NO surfing, NO GPS, NO games and NO apps!<br />
</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Rule #1 &#8211; If you are driving you must ignore all text messages, e-mails and phone calls that come into your mobile phone. You can respond later after you are safely off the road and stopped!</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Rule #1 &#8211; JUST PUT THE DAMN PHONE DOWN AND DRIVE!</strong></em></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Corollary Rules:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>Do NOT talk or text with someone you know is driving! Do your friend, associate, or loved one a favor and tell them to turn off the phone and drive, then end the conversation!</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>If you are a passenger in a vehicle driven by someone who is using a mobile phone, you should remind them of Rule #1. If they ignore you, then offer to make or receive calls or texts for them so they can concentrate on driving. If they refuse, you should simply ask them to stop and let you out! </strong></em></li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m sure most of you have heard all of this before, and I congratulate those of you that have taken the advice. You can absolve yourself of guilt, and you, your friends and colleagues and many others you may never know will live a longer and happier life because of it. For those of you that have yet to take Rule #1 to heart please let me give you some background information that may sway your opinion.</p>
<p>There is often debate in this country about the politics and costs of war. Most people would agree that the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns have exacted a heavy toll in both life and treasure from all sides. According to <a href="http://icasualties.org/" target="_blank">iCasualties.org</a>, the total coalition fatalities for the entire Iraq War from 2003 to 2012 was 4804. Total fatalities in Afghanistan War for the period 2001 to 2012 were 2916. Now, consider that according to NHTSA, &#8220;In 2009, 5,474 people were killed in crashes involving driver distraction, and an estimated 448,000 were injured.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unbelievable as it seems, we kill more people on our own highways every year due to driver distraction than the coalition side lost through the entire Iraq war and most of the Afghanistan operation! Distracted driving is costing us almost double the number of lives lost on 9/11 every year. Where is the outrage?</p>
<p>Mobile phone use is not the only cause of distraction. Stupid things like reading maps, playing with radios and GPS systems, and trying to eat while driving also contribute, but the mobile phone is now the prime cause of distraction on the road.  I&#8217;m not going to go further into the statistics here since you can find the data just as easily as I can. If you need a starting point though try this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.distraction.gov/" target="_blank">http://www.distraction.gov/</a></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t believe the government then read this story:</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/03/girlfriends-final-texts-a-warning-on-distracted-driving/" target="_blank">March 12, 2012, ABC News.com: Girlfriend’s Final Texts a Warning on Distracted Driving</a></p>
<p>and ask yourself what makes you so different or special that we won&#8217;t see a similar story about you or someone you love some day?</p>
<p>On an average day in this country some 15 people will lose their lives and another 1,227 or so will be injured as a result of distracted driving. Fortunately, there is something each of us can do every day to reduce these numbers. Please start today and observe Security Rule #1 for mobile phones!</p>
<p><strong>Update March 22, 2012</strong></p>
<p>Less than a week since I made this post we now learn that it is also dangerous to Text while walking! If you don&#8217;t believe me see this article for the proof!</p>
<p><a href="http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/22/gotta-watch-the-perils-of-texting-and-walking/" target="_blank">March 22, 2012 &#8211; CNN.com: The perils of walking and texting</a></p>
<p>Now if this woman can walk off a pier while texting is there any chance you want to be on the road with others like her that are texting while driving? This is serious business folks. Please just put the phone down and drive! The rest of us thank you for your consideration!</p>
<p><strong>Update May 14, 2012</strong></p>
<p>I found this article today that again points out how people can&#8217;t seem to manage to walk and text much less drive and text!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-57433581-501465/texting-while-walking-banned-in-n.j-town/?tag=cbsnewsSectionContent.11" target="_blank">May 14, 2012 &#8211; CBSnews.com &#8211; Texting while walking banned in N.J. Town</a></p>
<p>be sure to check out the links to the viral videos of a man who almost ran into bear while texting and a woman who fell into the mall water fountain when walking and texting.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.securitybeacon.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1374</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

